is that too many people think that it is perfectly acceptable for government to do things which it has no Constitutional basis doing.
For example, in yesterday’s Albany Herald, the Editorial Board says “Once you get past the argument of whether the government should even be doing this sort of thing, it makes sense.”
The problem is, government exists for certain extremely limited situations, and nothing more. Those situations are things that the individual CANNOT do for himself. Things like a court system for redress of grievances against a neighbor or other party, national defense from foreign invasion, even things like roads to connect places with other places.
But the Herald’s editorial board isn’t talking about any of those issues, or even similar ones such as water and libraries.
The Herald is talking about ‘Cash for Clunkers’, the Federal program that gives people $4500 to trade in their old ‘clunker’ for a newer, more ‘efficient’ model. They could just as well be talking about government-forced insurance, killing the elderly or infirm because saving them doesn’t meet the threshold of some cost/benefit analysis, killing the unborn or recently born over population control concerns, PATRIOT Act, No Child Left Behind, or any number of other programs that are NOT government’s concern.
After all, “Once you get past the argument of whether the government should even be doing this sort of thing, [any of the above] makes sense.”
Quite simply, we here at SWGAPolitics.com will NEVER get past the argument of whether government should even be doing something it should not be doing, and if the Libertarian Party ever gets past that argument, I will leave that Party just as fast as I left the GOP when I finally realized THEY had gotten past that argument.
August 2nd, 2009 |