February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

A ‘Comprehensive Revision of Georgia’s Gun Laws’ a good thing?

HB 615 is being heralded as a “comprehensive revision of Georgia’s gun laws”, but it has recently come under fire from some even within the liberty movement.

I needed to look at this bill for a few reasons, and so today I did. What I found was rather interesting, and has changed my views on the bill as it exists at this moment.

First, I think that this bill will pass any Constitutionality challenge based on the requirement of a single subject, as the subject here is gun rights, and the various areas HB 615 changes are all specific instances of laws regarding gun rights.

As far as the various changes made in HB 615, the first is that the phrase “pistol, revolver, or concealable firearm” is replaced with “weapon”, allowing a greater range of weaponry to be legally carried. One problem I have with this is that “weapon” is never clearly defined, and thus a restrictive definition could be added at a later time. Other than that though, this seems like a good move.
[Continue Reading]

Georgia Health Care Constitutional Amendment

Last week, State Senator Judson Hill (R-Marietta) announced that he had crafted a proposal for a Constitutional Amendment that would protect Georgians from any “public option” health care proposal at the Federal level and that he had the support of the Senate Republican Caucus in this effort.

As always, I try to read the bill before I comment on it. I figure that I can’t ask my Representatives to do something I’m not willing to do myself, and I also like to be informed so that I can then pass the knowledge on to y’all and whoever else asks me any questions.

This morning, Senator Hill sent me the text of the bill, which you can see for yourself here.

There are no calls for “states rights”, “10th Amendment”, “nullification”, or any other such thing in this bill – though the first two were mentioned at a press conference last week, by both Hill and Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock).
[Continue Reading]

Austin Scott Explains HB 96 (The “Georgia Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 2009″)

I got a call from Austin Scott, the author of HB 96, the Georgia Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 2009, yesterday. I recently discussed this bill in my “State House Bills I Find Interesting” commentary series, where I opposed it with a rank of 4 – meaning that while in general the bill may be decent, there was one particular issue I had with it that I objected to so much that I would kill the entire bill just to kill that clause.

For me, that issue was that the State of Georgia was exempted from this, and therefore could create or endorse monopolies at will, such as in regards to healthcare and utilities, among other areas.

Scott explained that the intent of this bill was aimed directly at gas stations fixing prices. For example, let’s say that in Cartersville there are 5 gas stations and they are all owned by Jim Bob. Well, without this bill, Scott’s contention is that Jim Bob can set whatever prices he wants at all 5 of those stations and if his stations are the only ones around, people will be forced to pay whatever price he demands. The State can’t do anything about this under current law except during an emergency, which is why Scott introduced this bill. Apparently, he had lawyers look to other States – Texas specifically was mentioned – and model this bill after their laws.

I can see his point there, and Scott said he would examine the points I brought up regarding state-sponsored monopolies. Hopefully he will make this bill into something I can support, and if he does, I will point it out here. After all, the whole point of this series is to both inform you, the readers, of the bills the General Assembly is working with so that hopefully better laws can be crafted.

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 91 – HB 100)

Conclusions:
HB 91: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 92: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 93: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 94: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 95: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 96: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 97: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 98: SUPPORT Rating: 7
HB 99: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 100: OPPOSE Rating: 4
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 81 – HB 90)

Conclusions:
HB 81: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 82: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 83: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 84: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 85: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 86: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 87: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 88: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 89: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 90: OPPOSE Rating: 1
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 71 – HB 80)

Conclusions:
HB 71: SUPPORT Rating: 8
HB 72: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 73: OPPOSE Rating: 5
HB 74: OPPOSE Rating: 5
HB 75: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 76: OPPOSE Rating: 3
HB 77: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 78: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 79: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 80: OPPOSE Rating: 1
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 61 – HB 70)

Conclusions:
HB 61: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 62: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 63: OPPOSE Rating: 5
HB 64: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 65: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 66: SUPPORT Rating: 7
HB 67: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 68: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 69: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 70: OPPOSE Rating: 1
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 51 – HB 60)

Conclusions:
HB 51: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 52: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 53: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 54: OPPOSE Rating: 5
HB 55: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 56: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 57: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 58: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 59: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 60: SUPPORT Rating: 7
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 41 – HB 50)

Conclusions:
HB 41: OPPOSE Rating: 3
HB 42: SUPPORT Rating: 7
HB 43: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 44: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 45: OPPOSE Rating: 3
HB 46: SUPPORT Rating: 6
HB 47: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 48: OPPOSE Rating: 4
HB 49: OPPOSE Rating: 3
HB 50: SUPPORT Rating: 10
[Commentary]

State House Bills I Find Interesting (HB 31- HB 40)

Conclusions:
HB 31: SUPPORT Rating: 10
HB 32: SUPPORT Rating: 8
HB 33: SUPPORT Rating: 7
HB 34: SUPPORT Rating: 8
HB 35: SUPPORT Rating: 9
HB 36: OPPOSE Rating: 2
HB 37: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 38: OPPOSE Rating: 3
HB 39: OPPOSE Rating: 1
HB 40: SUPPORT Rating: 9
[Commentary]