February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

What is a Libertarian

What follows originally appeared in The Albany Journal and on thealbanyjournal.com.

On a web comment regarding Leesburg City Council candidate Jeff Sexton, someone claimed that they opposed Jeff because he was a libertarian.  This person claimed that libertarians want to take down all government, and specifically cited police and fire departments as targets of ours.  Now, the ignorance was abundant in this comment.  However, there is a misunderstanding on what libertarianism is and what we actually want. Continue reading What is a Libertarian

Nathan Deal and Fiscal Irresponsibility

Let’s get real about Deal.  This candidate says he believes in fiscal responsibility, going even so far as to introduce a bill in Congress called “The Fiscal Responsibility Act.”

And Nathan Deal is by far and away the least fiscally responsible candidate running for Governor this year.

Barnes balanced the budget every year he was Governor, getting a B from the CATO institute. Nathan Deal sure hasn’t done a great job as a Congressman in balancing the budget.  Now, Nathan Deal is attacking Barnes for proposing a 300 million dollar tax cut for businesses without a plan to pay for it.  Really?  Because, one of the biggest contributions to our national debt has been the Bush tax cuts that were pushed through with no plans to pay for them.  Deal had no problem supporting that mountain of debt (over 2 trillion) added to our grandchildren.  How do we know his prior fiscal irresponsibility won’t carry over into his possible administration?

Barnes spent about 15k on air travel this gubernatorial cycle.  Nathan Deal spent 135k.  We’re talking NINE TIMES what Barnes spent on airplanes.  Of course, it’s no surprise to find that the 135k is going to a company Nathan Deal co-owns.  He’s spending nine times the amount of Barnes to get the same job done.  How do we know his campaign’s fiscal irresponsibility won’t carry over into his possible administration?

And, of course, at this point an entire book could be written about The Deal Financial Scandal.  Deal’s Financial Scandal has more twists and turns than Chutes and Ladders.  There’s a great summary up over at The Perimeter Progressive, but saying that Deal has some personal financial issues at this point would be putting it kindly.  How do we know his personal fiscal irresponsibility won’t carry over into his possible administration?

The next Governor of the great state of Georgia has the legal obligation to balance our budget.  But everything we’ve seen from Deal, from his prior governmental experiences to his campaign experiences to his personal experiences, shows he’s just incapable of actually balancing a budget.  How do we know his fiscal irresponsibility won’t lead our state into financial ruin?

We don’t.

No Deal Georgia.

Lee County Sign Ordinance Workshop

Last night the Lee County Board of Commissioners held what was advertised as a “Sign Ordinance Workshop.” I was personally invited by County administrator Alan Ours to bring my opinions about the workshop, then later in the week invited by the Lee County Chamber of Commerce to do the same. During the presentation by the consultants I was beginning to get frustrated listening to the presenters tell half truths and skirt serious flaws in the document. It was at this point I ask Chairman Ed Duffy if I could ask questions of the consultants to clarify some of my issues with the sign ordinance. At that point I was told that this was not an open meeting and I would not be given the opportunity to question the consultants. I informed Mr. Duffy that I was invited to bring my opinions by 2 different people and ask him again why the meeting was posted as an open workshop and verified the public’s input was not welcomed. At this point I gathered my effects and stood up and began to exit the meeting. Mr. Ours had Mr. Duffy stop me and ask me to stay and they stated they would allow our opinions to be heard as several other businessmen also stated their displeasure in the chairs statement.

After a few questions by the public and commissioners it became clear the consultants were being paid to present a document that wasn’t worth the paper it was written on. There are areas in the document that contradict each other, and still other areas that are made vague so that it leaves interpretation up to the courts.

The biggest issues that struck the board as absurd was the recommendation that only one flagpole could be erected per lot and that didn’t sit well with commissioner Rick Muggridge. It was also discussed that there are points in the ordinance which would have the county allowing a billboard monopoly rather than allowing free market economics to play.

The citizens in attendance had many concerns as well, particularly the flag issue, multi-tenant property signs, and signage laws that would limit the growth of the Hwy 82 Corridor. The consultants did make some changes to the originally proposed document so it would fall in line with current State law, as well as stating that flags wouldn’t be regulated in residential areas, however this wasn’t in the document and as the document is currently organized it would be left up to interpretation.

I think several of the questions asked opened the eyes of some commissioners, but I think their hands are tied by bureaucracy. This morning I sent an email to Commissioner Rick Muggridge asking if he would support the drafting of a new ordinance to offer them an alternate to the one presented by the Camilla, GA Consulting firm.

Misuse of County assets in Lee County

Last night while enjoying an adult beverage and a cigar on my front porch I saw blatant misuse of county assets that SHOULD cost an employee their job. I watched the Lee County mosquito spray truck enter my neighbors yard and spray the front and back yard of their PRIVATE property. I immediately notified County Chairman Ed Duffy of the time and place of the incident. In these days of economic crunch it’s time to keep a vigilant eye out for clear misuse of county assets.

State Capitalism is an oxymoron

The original post of this appears over at TomKnighton.com, as well as many others you might find interesting.  Go on over and check it out.

You would think that a columnist for the New York Times would understand a few things.  For example, the definition of capitalism.  However, in his column today, David Brooks illustrates that perhaps that’s not necessarily the case.  He points to nations like Russia, China, and Venezuela.  It’s pretty clear that Brooks doesn’t grasp that if the state runs it, it can’t be capitalism. Continue reading State Capitalism is an oxymoron

Politics of the Panthers

What follows is a post originally appearing on my blog, TomKnighton.com.  Please feel free to come on over and check it out.

-Tom

Politics, particularly racial politics, is always a touchy subject.  Racial politics in particular.  All to often, we constrain our voices in fear that our opinions will be labeled racist.  Many people see someone of another race accomplish something, or get a helping hand from someone, and it becomes easy to assume that race plays a factor either way.  However, it doesn’t have to be that way. Continue reading Politics of the Panthers

And your point is?

Guns are a touchy subject with me. They always have been, and always will be. You see, I rarely see a single object so vilified as the gun. Sitting in a room, not being touched, it is harmless. It takes motion to cause it to discharge, sending it’s projectile down the barrel with supersonic velocity. That motion is almost always generated by man, whether through intention or negligence. And yet, it’s the gun that gets the blame.

The latest hit piece against the firearm came yesterday from MSNBC (shocking, right?). Continue reading And your point is?

Initial thoughts on the Lee County Sign Ordinance

Read the Ordinance

Complete disgust doesn’t begin to explain how I feel about this proposal. It seems that the Board of Commissioners feels it is their duty to “protect private property values” enough so to mention it not once, but twice in the statement of purpose. I also find it interesting that they say they are trying to “protect the public” from, “Individuals right to convey their message through sign.” This statement alone clearly makes this ordinance unconstitutional in my mind, because they clearly stated they are removing a persons constitutional right for the good of the public.

First let me say, I am not going to raise to many issues with the commercial aspects of the sign ordinance, I see their restrictions as more of a “sign tax” than limiting freedom of expression. I also believe the permit process if applied fairly everyone can come out happy with a win/win for the County and Commerce.

Now it’s time to dig into the residential ordinance, it is fairly simple, you get 3 ground signs, no lighted signs(directly or indirectly).

So that being said, I have a home alarm system installed at my residence, I have a sign with my address and the name of the alarm company, placed by my front porch indirectly lighted by my front porch lights at night. This is clearly illegal according to the new ordinance, but I’m guessing it would never be enforced. But I digress, if you move forward from my porch and to the right about 3 feet, I have a Chicago Bears Banner “sign” in my garden, strike two, this might be offensive to my neighbors. But when I continued around my house I came into direct violation, because the next sign isn’t a ground sign, instead it is an, “Albany Fence Co.” sign affixed to my chain link fence. I was also reading through back and forth through the ordinance, and I’ll be damned if my 2 sets of house numbers aren’t in direct violation of the ordinance as they are both wall signs and neither of them are exempted, which I am guessing puts this ordinance in direct conflict with another county ordinance I am too lazy to look up.

What really irks me is that our County Officials PAID someone to write this piece of garbage that still violates State Law:
OCGA 16-7-58(a)(2) states

It shall be unlawful for any person to place posters, signs, or advertisements: On any private property unless the owner thereof or the occupier as authorized by such owner has given permission to place such posters, signs, or advertisements on such property; and, provided, further that no municipal, county, or consolidated government may restrict by regulation or other means the length of time a political campaign sign may be displayed or the number of signs which may be displayed on private property for which permission has been granted

I am at a loss for words for why the County Board would even consider approving such a policy. In fact if they did I would make it a point to wear the planning and zoning office out reporting all of these illegal signs! I mean considering they can fine someone up to $1000 and put them in jail for 60 days, I’d rather the county fine these lawbreaking no good citizens so that maybe they can lower my taxes.

Citizens of Lee County we need to make a stand, tell the county, that they don’t need to protect reasonable citizen’s from themselves.

Incumbents don’t get it yet!

We here at SWGAPolitics.com recently sent out invitations via email to attend our candidates forum on June 12. Yesterday I followed up with phone calls. By design it is amazing how few of these people have phone numbers listed on their websites to even contact a staff member. Surprisingly, I did find a phone number for Karen Handel and got to speak with a campaign staffer. The first time I got transferred to a dead phone line, later in the day I gave a staffer all of my contact information. This lead to an interesting e-mail. It seems that Karen Handel must think that we want her to attend this event, because in order for her to attend we at SWGAPolitics.com are supposed to submit a “Campaign Scheduling Request”, Karen you won’t be getting this request from us, we sent you an invitation to speak at a forum to help your campaign, not for our good. The fact is this event is costing SWGAPolitics.com to put on and we are glad to spend the money to provide a much needed service to the public, who otherwise wouldn’t get to see candidates prior to an election.

Politics gone too far

Politics is an ugly business. From backroom deals, to somewhat legal payoffs, many people get turned off on the process and never look at it again. While some things are somewhat unavoidable, like scandals that are bound to happen to members of any party, some aren’t. It’s probably because of this ugliness that we have the voter apathy in this country, a problem that has lead us to the point we’re at right now. If there’s going to be hope for tomorrow, we need future voters who are interested in the process and understand where the money comes from.

But harassing a 16 year old kid via email? Pretty sad really. Continue reading Politics gone too far