Over the last week or so, two events have really hit home in exposing the hypocrisy of the GOP when it comes to being ‘pro-Constitution’.
The first was the Atlanta Flood. A multitude of things could be said about it, but the most glaring thing to me is that many area (and statewide) GOP candidates and leaders were clamoring for MORE government involvement via FEMA and “disaster relief funds” – all the while claiming that government should stay OUT of healthcare and return to its Constitutional basis. Of these, Attorney General Candidate Sam Olens – also the Chair of the Cobb County Board of Commissioners – was probably the most blatant when, per AJC’s Jim Galloway, he “said the entire region growing impatient waiting for President Barack Obama to sign a declaration of emergency that would unleash federal resources for the area.” Why weren’t these ‘leaders’ instead pointing out the unconstitutionality of FEMA and these funds?
Indeed, the ONLY GOP candidate who publicly decried FEMA and “federal disaster relief funds” as the unconstitutional mess it is was Ray McBerry, who said via press release last Thursday:
With the recent flooding in Atlanta, Gov. Purdue and John Oxendine ran straight to the federal government by asking that FEMA intervene in the cleanup. Ray McBerry takes another position. Believing that Georgia is quite capable of launching an internal system for cleanup and restoration after the damaging rains, he asserts that Georgians are the answer to Georgia’s problem.
Now, I personally don’t believe even the State of Georgia should be giving away our tax dollars for such “relief”. As I said last week, the American Way is not government assistance, but individuals helping individuals, families helping families, friends helping friends, and neighbors helping neighbors. Indeed, the backstory of Davey Crockett’s “Not Yours To Give” speech illustrates this perfectly in a situation that could well have been ripped from last week’s headlines – and yet happened nearly 200 years ago.
Moving on though, and using the “Not Yours to Give” speech as a segue, since it was first told to me by a friend from the extreme corner of NWGA, let’s talk about another incident from around his neck of the woods.
Friday afternoon, the Chattanooga NBC affiliate reported that cheerleaders at Lakeview-Fort Ogelthorpe High School in Fort Ogelthorpe, GA (in extreme North GA, not very far from the GA-TN border) had been banned from displaying the signs they spent all summer making for the football team to run through at the opening to games this season. The reason? Apparently, they all had “inspirational messages” – which turned out to be Bible verses – on them, and the school – correctly – said that this was a violation of the First Amendment guarantee of no government involvement in religion. Indeed, yesterday’s update on the report makes this case brilliantly, and I quote it here:
Catoosa County Public Schools has determined it is a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution for signs with Bible verses to be displayed on the football field. Superintendent Denia Reese said, ‘I regret that we had to ask the LFO cheerleaders to change the signs used in the stadium prior to football games. Personally, I appreciate this expression of their Christian values; however, as Superintendent I have the responsibility of protecting the school district from legal action by groups who do not support their beliefs.’
“The 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids the enactment of any law or practice ‘respecting an establishment of religion.’ The purpose of the Bill of Rights was to protect the rights of the minority; for this reason, the stamp of approval of religion by the government is not a matter subject to majority vote.
“Regarding public education, families entrust public schools with the education of their children, but condition their trust on the understanding that school activities will not purposely be used to advance religious views that may conflict with their religious beliefs. As a result, the courts prohibit Rabbi-led prayers at school sporting events, Wiccan posters in gymnasiums, and reading the Koran over the school public announcement system.
“The U.S. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals have ruled that religious activities at high school football games create the ‘inescapable conclusion’ that the school endorses the religious activity. Violations of these rulings can lead to lawsuits resulting in injunctions, unnecessary legal costs and damages that have to be paid by the local taxpayers, and possibly the loss of federal funding.
Again, I was raised a Southern Baptist and still consider myself a Baptist. I have ZERO problems with prayer or reading the Bible, and actively encourage both practices – in private. I also acknowledge that others have different religious beliefs, and therefore a PUBLIC school should be strictly neutral on matters of religion, as should government in general.
You see, I actually believe in the ENTIRE Constitution, unlike some Facebook friends of mine, such as Don Hutelin, leader of the “Heritage Republicans” in that area, and Jeremy Jones, a candidate for the 9th District US House of Representatives seat. Both of these men like to purport to be lovers of the Constitution, yet clearly they mean only the parts they like.
No, the Catoosa County School System made the right call here, and they are the true lovers of the Constitution on this issue – not the GOP leaders and candidates who think the Constitution only applies when they like what is happening.
So here we see two instances of the GOP showing its hypocrisy on being ‘pro-Constitution’ in all of its ugly glory. As their record from 2002-2006 -when the GOP was in full control both at the State and National level- shows, all they care about is political posturing and grabbing more and more power for themselves, no matter what they say at the moment.
If you actually believe in the ENTIRE Constitution and giving the political power back to the People as the Founding Fathers envisioned it, I invite you to join me in the Libertarian Party – the TRUE ‘Party of Principle’.
The 1st Amendment states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…… etc
I think the principles statements are incorrect. This is a cop-out and the principle should be terminated for not allowing the signs. How bad is it in America that a group of Cheerleaders can’t display a sign that says “Treat others as you would have them treat you”
Sorry, the Superintendent.
It is a cop-out to follow the Constitutional requirement of strict neutrality when it comes to government and religion?
What if the verse was from the Koran or Bhagavad Gita instead of the Bible? My position would be exactly the same. Would yours?
I have never understood how both self professed libertarians and so called religious conserv-atives can both be so wrong on this issue. I challenge anyone to show me where this nation has established The Church of the United States. A Bible or Koran verse on a football poster or a Mennorah on the courthouse square does not establish a religion. And to those on the right, just because we are a nation founded on a Judaeo-Christian ethic does not mean you can expect the government to endorse your beliefs at the expense of all others.
I have stated before that you and I are 180 degrees apart on this issue Jeff.
If the governement is neutral, it would have no opinion on what religious expression the cheerleaders presented. As far as the Koran or Bhagavad Gita being posted instead of the Bible? Absolutely. My position would be the same.
I think the First Amendment declares that the free exercise of religion should not be prohibited – whether it is Jewish, Muslim, Buddist, and yes (gasp) even Christian.
Allowing Christian girls to post banners, or students to pray does not equate to the government establishing a religion any more than another student wearing a Star of David on a necklace.
Your interpretation is one where the government restricts conduct. My interpretation is one which allows conduct. Which promotes true religious freedom in the sense that our Constitutional forefathers intended?
Using the same analysis, should freedom of speech, if it offends someone’s sensibilities – only be allowed in private? I love you man. But we will just have to disagree on this one.
Those trouble-making cheerleaders are at it again. In junior high in the late 70s, I wondered about the cheer “When we get to heaven…we will say…the other team went the other way.” My high school’s squad still does that cheer; no big deal to me.
The founding fathers of this nation never envisioned the issues that would come up two centuries later. Would the nation be better in everyone functioned with a value system and moral code. Yes. Can the government impose such a system constitutionally? Who knows but the government is then expected to react to the problems created by directionless citizens. I tip my hat to members of congress who want to do it by the book: pass an amendment to clarify the relationship between the church and state.
I think some people don’t fully consider their “good ideas.” If your job transferred your Methodist family to Utah and your kids came home to inform you of the Mormon prayers and readings at public school—get the point. This issue is the center point in the debate on school choice. I wouldn’t pretend to have the answers but I am smart enough to know that it is complex do to the size and diversity of our nation.
The other day I was thinking: you have these nations that take their faiths and run the government based on those faiths. Consider that point but plug in America as the nation.
While I am a centrist Democrat, I have always liked former GOP Georgia congressman Mac Collins because he is just a real self-made guy. During a televised campaign debate a few years ago, Collins strongly voiced his support for school prayer or something about church in the schools. A panelist asked him if that contradicted his earlier statements about limiting federal involvement in local schools.
Jeff, good topic.
[...] first incident is the now-infamous case of the Lakeview-Fort Ogelthorpe Cheerleaders. In the latest news on that front, the Catoosa County School Board made exactly the correct [...]