Healthcare Reform is a Trojan Horse

What has become of the healthcare debate in America? We really pounded our Congressmen and Senators during the August recess at the various town hall meetings and it all seemed to come to a head with the March on Washington on September 12. The question now becomes this. Have we taken a big enough step that our representatives will listen to us or are they simply waiting for us to quiet down so that they can proceed?

A source of mine in Washington says that the House is about to start working again on a healthcare proposal. “Which one,” I asked. There are about five up there now including the new Baucus Bill. My source says that the House will try to reconcile elements of all of the bills into one. This may add 200-1500 extra pages to the already monstrous bill, HB 3200. Once that is done, a new HB number will be issued. PatientsFirst has called for a national “Call Congress Day” on October 6, 2009. It looks like it is time to pick up the fight again folks, and October 6 could be too late. To take the field, a general once said, “Get there first with the most.”

So what has been going on with the healthcare debate? Insurer Humana sent a one page letter to it’s clients about how Medicare will be affected under the proposed bill. The letter received criticism from Max Baucus, who later sent federal regulators to Humana according to an article in the Wall Street Journal.
The article goes on to say:

Earlier this month, Humana sent a one-page letter to its customers enrolled in its Medicare Advantage plans, which offer private options to Medicare beneficiaries. Humana noted that, because of spending cuts proposed by Democrats, “millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services that make Medicare Advantage health plans so valuable.” The Kentucky-based company also urged its customers to contact their Representatives. Pretty tame stuff, as these things go.

Because we live in a new Thugocracy, Baucus’ reaction isn’t surprising. It is simply a sign of the times for our new administration.

The nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation has a report that says that Medicare Advantage programs could be cut by more than $172 billion which would result in about six million seniors being denied access to and affordable Medicare Advantage plan. Is it wrong to raise these concerns?

I know. We would never ration healthcare for seniors. Seniors and very young children have had priority when it comes to getting a flu shot in previous years. Not with the new H1N1 shots. When it comes to priority, Seniors get in the back of the line according to an article in the New York Times.

What about the remark from Congressman Joe Wilson? Did President Obama really lie to the joint sessions of Congress? It seems that Wilson’s declaration has resulted in an ID card being required to receive government run healthcare in the Baucus bill. Once this passes, we will turn our backs on illegals, right? Give me a break! President Obama still has immigration reform as one of his top priorities following healthcare and energy reform according to the Politico.

The President’s healthcare talking points have undergone a fact check at TownHall.com.

The article, written by Congressman John Boehner, says that the Lewin Group conducted an independent analysis that shows as many as 114 million Americans could lose their current insurance and be forced on the government plan under HR 3200.
The President says that there will be no tax increases, but the bill reads on page 167 “TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.” That tax is where I want to focus the last part of this post.
In an article published in the New York Post on September 21 and also available on his blog, Dick Morris wrote the following:

The poor will still have Medicaid. But for those earning more, the required premiums will be worse than any tax increase. For example, CBO estimates that when the program is fully implemented — by 2016 — an individual earning $32,400 a year would have to pay $4,100 in premiums before getting any subsidy. With deductibles and co-payments, he’d have to shell out $5,600 a year, or 17.3 percent of his income. A family of four, making $80,000 a year, would have to pay about $10,500 in premiums alone — with deductibles and co-payments, up to $15,000 or just under 20 percent of income.

We have been told that we need to be a compassionate nation and follow others in the industrialized world—you know the ones who come here for the best healthcare services on the globe. However, where is the compassion for taxing a healthy individual making $32,400 by $5,600 in the above example? People had better wake up now. Especially if the fight is back on to control your healthcare and raise your taxes.

It makes one wonder if this healthcare bill is really a Trojan Horse designed to destroy wealth in America and bring us from Socialism to full fledged Communism on the fast track—just as fast as Pelosi can ram in through the House. Stop reading this blog and call your Congressman today. The Congressional switchboard is (202)224-3121

Tags: , September 23, 2009 – 2:34 pm Posted in Editorial by Bill Waller

12 Responses to “Healthcare Reform is a Trojan Horse”

  1. griftdrift Says:

    Nothing like a little red scare to perk up the day.



  2. Bill Waller Says:

    Griftdrift,
    I’d appreciate it if you can tell me where I am wrong instead of just saying that this is simply “red scare.” I hope that I am, but I see this as a dangerous pill that has been disguised with a candy wrapper. Don’t just say I’m wrong either. Show me specifics.



  3. Bill Says:

    Griftdrift, the Democrats don’t want to put out the bill prior to the vote. Check it out!

    Democrats nix putting pre-vote health bill online
    (AP) – 4 hours ago

    WASHINGTON — Senate Finance Committee Democrats have rejected a GOP amendment that would have required a health overhaul bill to be available online for 72 hours before the committee votes.

    Republicans argued that transparency is an Obama administration goal. They also noted that their constituents are demanding that they read bills before voting.

    Democrats said it was a delay tactic that could have postponed a vote for weeks.



  4. griftdrift Says:

    Nope. Not going down that Hannityesque rabbit hole.

    Instead I’ll give you a quote.

    “Conservative commentators are right to warn about the consequences of our present course, I just wish they did so with a little less recourse to Manichean, conspiratorial, or absurd rhetoric.” ~Heather Macdonald

    I’d give you a lollipop too, but I’m afraid of being asked if I have been a member of the communist party.



  5. Bill Waller Says:

    If you are a member of the Communist party you could be next in line for a Czar position! (grin)



  6. Thomas A Holloway, CPA Says:

    Under the prospective plans we’ve read, the “its-not-really-a-tax” tax ranges from just under $1,000 a year for individuals to nearly $5,000 for families who do not purchase “acceptable” insurance policies. All of the proposals appear to follow a similar line. Obama denies that its a tax, and he can call it a ‘vanilla moon-pie’ if he wants to – but its still a tax primarily on the poor and will be collected through individual tax returns by the IRS.



  7. J.B. Manley Says:

    Well, Bill-

    Looks lke you have run into another mindless liberal. Ignore and move on-you will not be rewarded by engaging people like this in discourse.

    It is highly humorous to me that Obama thinks he can just hit the talk shows, repeat lie after lie, and try to look good while doing it. The man is just an empty suit-and more people each day are starting to wake up to that reality.

    P.S.- I LOVE that comment by Mr. Holloway that Obama could call it “Vanilla Moon Pie!”
    -Awesome!



  8. griftdrift Says:

    “Mindless liberal”

    snicker

    I love this blog



  9. Tom Says:

    While I don’t always agree with Grift, I wouldn’t classify him as anything approaching a “mindless liberal”. While he has some liberal positions on some things, he’s not necessarily a liberal.

    Hell, I have some liberal positions on some things…and I’m definitely not a liberal ;)



  10. Jeff Says:

    Gotta agree with Tom here. Grift and I have been known to throw down a time or two, and I’d be about the last to call him ‘mindless’. Even when he is wrong, he’s going to make sure you know your stuff.



  11. Bill Waller Says:

    I doubt Grift was offended by Manley’s comment. :)



  12. J.B. Manley Says:

    Well-

    Let’s see what Grift has got…. He just throws a little “red scare” reference around, and an obsure quote from some truly mindless liberal, and we are supposed to be in awe of his brilliance. (I’m just not feeling it-dog.)

    I believe Bill asked Grift to attack his position and offer some specific criticism based in fact.

    Come on, there big boy! I loved the article, and I can’t find a thing wrong with it…..

    -Could you possibly offer something a bit more thoughtful than “red scare,” or “Hannityesque rabbit hole?”

    -Bring it, Einstein!
    (I’ll be snacking on my Vanilla Moon Pie in pregnant anticipation.)



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress | Blue Weed by Blog Oh! Blog | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats