August 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Albany’s Ward 5: The 2009 battleground?

The following originally appeared in the Albany Journal and is written by Lon McNeil. As we follow local politics, and there’s been a lot of mention of Ward 5 Commissioner Bob Langstaff, I asked Lon if we could reprint the article here. He consented and Kevin Hogencamp gratiously emailed the piece to me to run. There is a section in bold type that may be particularly interesting to long-time readers of this blog.

This November, about half of Albany’s voters will be asked to make their voices heard on a host of critical issues. The Ward 5 City Commission race is shaping up to be an important measure of the political landscape. Continue reading Albany’s Ward 5: The 2009 battleground?

Deal. Real. Crook.

For those that missed this story in the AJC over the weekend, I apologize for my tardiness on it. I had quite a busy weekend with meetings, and I didn’t get a chance to write about it. I don’t feel THAT bad about just now getting to it though, since Erick only got to it this morning himself – though has apparently heard rumors of it for quite some time.

Nathan Deal is currently the US Representative from the 9th District and is running for Governor of Georgia in 2010. He first came on to the legislative scene during the 1980 election cycle, where he ran for an won a State Senate race, remaining in that position until being elected to his current position in the 1992 elections. He worked his way up to second in command of the State Senate, the position known as President Pro Tempore – currently held by Tommie Williams (R-Lyons).

Way back in 1982, the State of Georgia passed a law that said that any wrecked car had to be inspected before being allowed to be sold or driven. Remember, Deal was already in the General Assembly at this point. Unfortunately, LEGIS, the site that I use to do my bill research, only goes back to 1995, meaning that I cannot find this particular bill and how Deal voted on it at the time. Regardless, in 1989 the State contracted with one site in Athens to do the inspections, and expanded the program a year later.

At the beginning of February, 1990, Deal partnered with Ken Cronan to open Recovery Services, Inc. Under a non-competitive selection process, this brand new business became one of the sites the inspections program was expanded to. No paperwork exists to explain what the selection process was, and Deal currently doesn’t “know there was much of an official thing”. But remember, this was a State program and Deal was then a powerful enough State Senator that he was about to become the President Pro Tem of the Senate.
[Continue Reading]

Moving On…but only in due course

“I had an interesting conversation with a public person. The gist of part of it was …… who knows what the real story was with Buie and the other recipients of funds and what’s the point in dwelling on things that have already happened, so let’s move on and not ‘nit-pick.’

I do not intend to disclose her name and I consider her to be a business friend, but I must acknowledge that there must indeed be a line of thinking that does not want to dig any deeper or hold parties to these events accountable.” – Peter Studl

Peter wrote these words over the weekend, and frankly they disgust me. I’m not angry at Peter over these words. He’s just repeating what he was told. What disgusts me is how “public” people can honestly argue from this position. We may not know the full story behind Don Buie and what I’ve dubbed Buie-gate. But that’s hardly a reason not to learn it. Continue reading Moving On…but only in due course

Argue facts, not emotion

This morning on WALB, there was a story about the health care “debate”. I put that word in quotes because we’re not having a lot of debate by either side of the issue. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not criticizing the protests, or those who speak their mind at town halls. I’m talking about the folks outside. On the WALB piece, one Obama supporter said that it wouldn’t matter what the issue was, protestors would still be protesting because “they oppose this president”, while the next supporter said “we want debate.” It doesn’t sound like it, does it?

On the flip side, opponents have a bad habit of arguing the emotion as well. Sarah Palin’s notorious comments on “death panels” and shouts of rationing can be just the same. Now, as an opponent of President Obama’s health care reform plan, I understand the comments. I know those calls are based on what’s happened in other nations who have adopted similar systems. But within the bill, there’s no mention of “death panels” and there’s no mention of rationing. It ain’t there.

This isn’t new. It’s been happening for ages now. Those in power try to bully those who aren’t. Continue reading Argue facts, not emotion