<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Decisions Filter Down Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/07/31/supreme-court-decisions-filter-down-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/07/31/supreme-court-decisions-filter-down-fast/</link>
	<description>Free Thinking for a Free World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/07/31/supreme-court-decisions-filter-down-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swgapolitics.com/index/?p=2108#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my understanding that they&#039;re not.  At 17, they can be tried as an adult, so I don&#039;t see why the parents would be liable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my understanding that they&#8217;re not.  At 17, they can be tried as an adult, so I don&#8217;t see why the parents would be liable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debi Davis</title>
		<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/07/31/supreme-court-decisions-filter-down-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>Debi Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swgapolitics.com/index/?p=2108#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>Are parents of 17 year olds held responsible for other actions of their teens?  Say the teen throws a baseball threw your living room picture window, are the parents liable for the damages?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are parents of 17 year olds held responsible for other actions of their teens?  Say the teen throws a baseball threw your living room picture window, are the parents liable for the damages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil Lee Russell</title>
		<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/07/31/supreme-court-decisions-filter-down-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil Lee Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swgapolitics.com/index/?p=2108#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>The legal age for consent is the only relevant factor here; (In Texas, 17 is the legal age of consent provided that the partner is no more than 3 years older) American juries have a  problem with understanding right and wrong. Texas has, over the past 17 years, exonerated more than 2007 falsely convicted, (by juries) men for crimes they had been falsely convicted of. Are YOU prepared to entrust your life and the possibility of being falsely convicted and sent to prison because juries in America are incapable of making an equitable decision absent emotional interference. This may be a harsh critique of law abiding Americans but the facts are what they are. 
(source: Innocence Project of Texas: http://ipoftexas.org/
Please do not misunderstand my position. The actions of the teacher should require that he be dismissed and never be able to teach again. Good luck with that! That having been said, women in America have a passion for lying and falsely accusing men of crimes purely out of spite. With more than 50,000 American men having their lives destroyed Nationwide- with Texas leading the way 8 to 1- because American women are freely allowed to commit the crime of perjury at with and without contest by a Court system, State and Federal, that appears hell bent on destroying as many American lives as possible, why in the world should any man take a chance to being incarcerated for a decade or more-FALSELY- because his future depended upon the irrationality of people sitting on juries, who appear completely incapable of rendering an equitable decision. 
Moreover, if this is consensual, then it really isn’t anyone’s business except her parents and her family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legal age for consent is the only relevant factor here; (In Texas, 17 is the legal age of consent provided that the partner is no more than 3 years older) American juries have a  problem with understanding right and wrong. Texas has, over the past 17 years, exonerated more than 2007 falsely convicted, (by juries) men for crimes they had been falsely convicted of. Are YOU prepared to entrust your life and the possibility of being falsely convicted and sent to prison because juries in America are incapable of making an equitable decision absent emotional interference. This may be a harsh critique of law abiding Americans but the facts are what they are.<br />
(source: Innocence Project of Texas: <a href="http://ipoftexas.org/" rel="nofollow">http://ipoftexas.org/</a><br />
Please do not misunderstand my position. The actions of the teacher should require that he be dismissed and never be able to teach again. Good luck with that! That having been said, women in America have a passion for lying and falsely accusing men of crimes purely out of spite. With more than 50,000 American men having their lives destroyed Nationwide- with Texas leading the way 8 to 1- because American women are freely allowed to commit the crime of perjury at with and without contest by a Court system, State and Federal, that appears hell bent on destroying as many American lives as possible, why in the world should any man take a chance to being incarcerated for a decade or more-FALSELY- because his future depended upon the irrationality of people sitting on juries, who appear completely incapable of rendering an equitable decision.<br />
Moreover, if this is consensual, then it really isn’t anyone’s business except her parents and her family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

