Proms and Lesbians In the Bible Belt [ March 12, 2010 – 1:14 pm] by Jeff Posted in » General

I don’t know if y’all have seen this one, but over the past couple of days a story has come out about a certain high school senior in Mississippi. Seems this student likes to date girls and wants to wear a tux to prom.

The problem? The student’s name is Constance rather than Conrad.

Yes, Constance is a lesbian, and rather than just showing up at her prom wearing a tux with her girlfriend on her arm, she checked with the school to make sure she would be allowed to attend when she did. (There is a bit of debate over what she should have done here, and I’ve heard from both sides. Personally, I think she probably did the smart thing at this point in the story.)

The school refused, and when she threatened a lawsuit, the school cancelled prom altogether.
[Continue Reading]

Olens Sends Out His First Campaign Email[ July 22, 2009 – 7:13 pm]by Jeff Posted in » 2010 Campaigns

Sam Olens, the only Republican currently running for Attorney General, has just sent out the following email:

I am pleased to announce that I have received the endorsement of Joe D. Whitley, former U.S. Attorney in the Middle and Northern Federal Districts of Georgia during two presidential administrations.
[Continue Reading]

July 22nd, 2009 | Leave a Comment

What Do You Cut?[ July 22, 2009 – 6:45 pm]by Jeff Posted in » State

Much ado has been made over the past couple of days about Governor Purdue announcing his intentions to furlough teachers for three days this calendar year in a cost-saving measure designed to avoid a special session of the General Assembly.

I’ll be the first to point to several different things that could have been cut other than that, but there are a few things I want to point out:

First, until now, education hasn’t received any direct cuts, even though it is roughly 55% of the budget for this state.

Second, in keeping with the GOP way of doing things in this regard, Perdue didn’t actually mandate that teachers be furloughed – legally, he can’t. What he did was to cut the funding for local schools by three days per teacher. If a local school system wants to actually furlough the teachers that day, that is their call. They could try to save the money in other ways – such as by furloughing only central office staff for a longer period, expanding the ‘no bussing’ zone around schools, lengthening the distance between school bus stops, reducing the amount of supplies – including paper, pens, and toilet paper – bought, etc. Again, that decision is completely up to them.

Now, we’ve already got two Governor candidates, David Poythress and John Oxendine, coming out with statements here. Believe it or not, I actually agree with Ox’s statement that “Teachers need our absolute support and encouragement. I believe the root of the problem is not the amount of money coming into the state treasury, but how we are choosing to spend the money. It obviously hurts our teachers, but in the end it hurts every school child in this state.” My problem with Ox’s statement is that it is typical generic politician hogwash. I want details – and Poythress has already provided some.

Poythress’ statement can be found here, but here is where he gets specific on what he would do instead:

While I am a big supporter of rural economic development, and plan to make it a top priority in my Administration, it’s hard to justify spending this money when we can’t even pay our teachers. In short, some things like the “Go Fish” program should have to wait a year until we get our fiscal house in order. That’s not tough love – it’s the right thing to do.

Apparently Governor Perdue and the Atlanta politicians disagree.

A better decision would have been to delay or sunset special interest tax breaks. A 2008 Georgia State University study estimates that sales tax exemptions total $10 billion a year. If we were to furlough some of the special interest protections by just 1%, we could generate $100 million, help balance our budget and not cut teacher pay by a single penny.

A close examination of the tax breaks enacted in 2008 reveals two premium tax breaks for insurance companies, and tax exemption on fuel used by pig farmers and up to $50 million in tax credits for donors (corporate or individual) to private school scholarship funds. Thirty five special interest tax breaks enacted between 2005 and 2008 amount to $333 million in lost revenue in the FY2010 budget. The 17 special interest tax break bills enacted in 2009 will cost Georgia another $99 million in lost revenues.

Believe it or not, in talking about eliminating exceptions to the tax code, Poythress is actually talking about something talked about on this very site a few weeks ago. I doubt the General and I would agree on much else, but there is that!

Finally, I want to point out that I wish our leaders would do their job and cut/defund actual positions/programs, rather than passing the buck down the line. I understand their reluctance to micro-manage, and most of the time I applaud that. However, there IS a time for actually making a decision when those under you refuse to for whatever reason, and that time is now in regards to cutting/defunding specific positions and programs in this state.

I’ll post a follow-on post next week with some of my suggestions about what to cut, but what about you? If YOU were Governor or running for Governor, what would YOU cut? For your reference, here’s the Governor’s Budget Recommendations.

July 22nd, 2009 | Leave a Comment

Why it’s not up to the police to protect you[ July 22, 2009 – 2:00 pm]by Tom Posted in » Editorial

We live in troubled times with troubled people. In a post yesterday, I spoke briefly on who’s fault our crime problem is, and that I believe the blame doesn’t rest on law enforcement’s shoulders. There were some great comments, but I thought it was important to delve into why it’s not up to the police to protect you.

Obviously, many disagree. Yes, as a Libertarian, we are known for individualist positions and minimize the state’s role in just about anything. It’s easy to blow of my opinion as that of someone who wants less government overall. It’s also easy to blow off the comments of police when they tell you that they can’t, since obviously they’re to busy eating doughnuts instead of preventing crime, right?

Well, how about the court system? Read More …

July 22nd, 2009 | 3 Comments

Heads Up Albany[ July 22, 2009 – 12:44 pm]by Tom Posted in » Albany Dougherty County

We’re hearing multiple reports from multiple sources that some Albany area gangs are not happy with recent APD activities, and they are threatening to ramp up their activity level.

No need for panic, just be aware of your surroundings for the next couple of weeks until this dies down.

We here at SWGAPolitics.com applaud APD’s recent arrests, and urge them to continue the good work.

July 22nd, 2009 | Leave a Comment

He just doesn’t get it[ July 22, 2009 – 8:00 am]by Tom Posted in » Albany Dougherty County

Rod Jolivette must love making news. Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with that one per se. What I do have a problem with is Jolivette’s method of attracting attention. In this case, he’s filed another complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against for discrimination for not just against the City, but the City Manager as well.

He just doesn’t get it. Read More …

July 22nd, 2009 | 8 Comments

And the Lee County Library Costs keep going UP and now Alcohol?[ July 22, 2009 – 6:13 am]by Publius Posted in » Lee County

Last week, the Lee County Commissioners discussed the site selection of the New Library to be built on Hwy 82. Addition costs to acquire land range from $135,000 to $635,000 over the original $4.4 million plus the $1.5 million expansion. And this is not the end; additional costs will be coming, such as required road improvements. What is the final price to be?

Not reported by any other media was the word Alcohol. When discussing site B, directly across from the Lutheran Church, Commissioner Duffy asked the SRJ Architect representative if the Library would be far enough away, and was assured that the design had taken this into account. At least 3 times during the discussion Alcohol was brought up. Although I will take a glass of wine once in a while, I do have an issue here. When I asked Commissioner Roland after the meeting, he said this was the first he had heard of it.

My issues:

• The meeting room is part of the library, children go to the library, are we to close the library anytime an event occurs with Alcohol being served? I surely wouldn’t want children in the same building, if you are worried about the distance to a church why not children?
• Do we even want Alcohol to be allowed? The public hasn’t been asked, why not?
• Is the county going to issue itself a Liquor License?
• Is the county going to be open to a lawsuit, if someone drinks too much, leaves the event, and hurts someone while driving? Bars have been sued and so can the county.

All this, appears aim at getting just one event, the yearly Chamber of Commerce event, but it opens a big bag of worms.

There was only one other county resident at the last meeting, county residents need to make their views known to the County Commissions or you will pay the price.

-Mike Sabot

July 22nd, 2009 | 22 Comments

Powered by WordPress | Blue Weed by Blog Oh! Blog | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats