<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much For Law And Order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/06/10/so-muc-for-law-and-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/06/10/so-muc-for-law-and-order/</link>
	<description>Free Thinking for a Free World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/06/10/so-muc-for-law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swgapolitics.com/index/?p=1376#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I understand completely.  I personally think that people will still invest in bonds to some extent, though that will probably be reduced and it will ultimately be much more expensive for the companies themselves.  After all, the potential reward has to be higher to warrant taking the risk...of course, that starts to creep more towards stocks volitility and as you say it will turn off many potential investors.

As for the TARP money injecting liquidity into the market, you just &lt;em&gt;knew&lt;/em&gt; that the government would screw it up, didn&#039;t you? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand completely.  I personally think that people will still invest in bonds to some extent, though that will probably be reduced and it will ultimately be much more expensive for the companies themselves.  After all, the potential reward has to be higher to warrant taking the risk&#8230;of course, that starts to creep more towards stocks volitility and as you say it will turn off many potential investors.</p>
<p>As for the TARP money injecting liquidity into the market, you just <em>knew</em> that the government would screw it up, didn&#8217;t you? <img src='http://swgapolitics.com/index/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://swgapolitics.com/index/2009/06/10/so-muc-for-law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swgapolitics.com/index/?p=1376#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Tom,
Many conservative investors, especially the elderly, use bonds at their primary investment vehicle because they are more stable than stocks.  This decision by the Supreme Court puts bond holders in the back rather than first if a company goes belly up.  That will cause many bond investors to rethink that safety.  If they don&#039;t trust the bond market, they won&#039;t invest.  If they don&#039;t invest, companies cannot get the money they need to operate.  Hey, wasn&#039;t that the reason we needed the TARP funds--to free up liquidity in the market?  What a mess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
Many conservative investors, especially the elderly, use bonds at their primary investment vehicle because they are more stable than stocks.  This decision by the Supreme Court puts bond holders in the back rather than first if a company goes belly up.  That will cause many bond investors to rethink that safety.  If they don&#8217;t trust the bond market, they won&#8217;t invest.  If they don&#8217;t invest, companies cannot get the money they need to operate.  Hey, wasn&#8217;t that the reason we needed the TARP funds&#8211;to free up liquidity in the market?  What a mess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

